Best ddr5 4 sticks reddit. If multiple sticks show errors, test another slot.

Best ddr5 4 sticks reddit I would recommend testing each stick individually in slot 2 to check if one of them is faulty. The higher the frequency goes, the less likely you'll be able to get it running at rated speeds with four sticks. The current generation of DDR5 chips have 2GB of memory per chip, resulting in either: 4 chips at once in an 8GB DIMM -- this config has lower performance 8 chips at once in a 16GB DIMM -- this is single rank, has good performance and clocks high To the 64GB I had, I added another 64GB for a total of 4 x 32GB DDR5 Kingston Fury 5600MHz Sticks (128GB total). This is only apparent when running all four sticks mind you, as the speed advantage of DDR5 is greatly diminished when taxing the IMC. 4 sticks is doable, but most of the issues I’ve seen are regarding running 4 sticks is hitting the rated overclock speed (usually 6000+). It’s more difficult to get an overclock on 4 sticks vs just 2, but for some hardware configs and the higher XMP settings even overclocking 2 sticks can be challenging. Does the 13th… Digging through google a bit more, I realized 4 sticks of DDR5 is generally not that stable and that is the reason default speeds are lower and OC makes it unstable. Does this still hold true. An analogy is moving 4 people to the same destination. The big disadvantage of running 4 sticks, is that it tends to be harder to hit higher speeds than with just two. That just using 2 is better for DDR5 at this point in time. What are my options here aside from just disabling XMP? I'm fine with that if it's the only stable option, I'd just like to be fully educated. If sticks are single rank, you get dual rank per channel. Can scroll down memory support list on the link below, and then click the sort arrow on the memory socket support column '4' so that the arrow is blue pointing down. Turn off clear cmos remove all ram install two sticks one in each channel per the MB recommendations. I know some people can but idk about that motherboard. Are we really still having issues with using 4 sticks of RAM on a DDR5 system with Windows 11? My (relevant) specs are: Asus Z790-A Strix DDR5 version 4x 16gb Corsair 6400mhz C36 Using 2 sticks works fine, but upping that to 4 causes repeated crashes. My only concern is that xmp doesn't work properly with 4 sticks. Does the memory spec mean I can only run two sticks of RAM ( one pair of 2 x 32), and get 5200+? I've seen a lot of debate on the ddr5 situation, mostly that xmp does not work with 4 dimms of DDR5. 4x48gb @JEDEC speed is probably going to be the best bet for a DDR5 board. 4 sticks will perform better only if they are single rank, which means you will then have dual rank for each memory channel. I would like to fill all 4 dimm slots and use Dominator ram. Many CPUs might not do much (or any) higher than the rated speed for 4 sticks (DDR5 3600**) without manual setup of at least the termination resistances. 1ghz I stepped it down a few times even though 5. I would like to have 64gb of ddr5 but the 2x32gb kits have low frequency and high timings, which pointed me into going 4x16gb instead. 4 sticks of DDR5 is a bad idea , 4 sticks of ram is double the stress on the memory controller and that gets amplified the faster the ram is, at ddr4 3600 was a problem already, at DDR5 speeds (6000+) is way worse, to give you an idea the max officially suported by the CPU when running 4 sticks of dual rank (4x32gb) of DDR5 3600, anything above But! But avoid using more than 2 sticks with XMP! If you use 4 and want to use XMP you could end up with a higher memory bandwith than your CPU has. You will have difficulty reaching DDR5 6000 speeds with 4 sticks. At all. My question is: is it better to run 2 DDR5 32GB(each) total 64GB at 6000Mhz Or 4 DDR5 32GB, total 128GB at a stable 3600Mhz? Not a newbie just didn’t research and wanna see people’s thoughts. Now Im new to DDR5 Ram and would like suggestions on what would work best. It's more expensive, but the premium you pay guarantees stability. Even the same ram, will only run at best at JDEC speeds. You can buy a $800 board and the best Hynix A-die, but it's not going to matter if the CPU just can't handle beyond 5200mhz at 4x32GB. Some get luckier than others and that’s a stable clock, others will say it’s not 100% stable, and it’s not uncommon for it to be run at 5600-6000mhz for stability with 4 sticks. Hogwarts is really memory hungry and games will just keep going that trend. Which means that 2 sticks are favoured when overclocking. is the XPG Lancer DDR5 RGB 6000MHz 32GB OK I have been able to run the RAM much more easily at 5800MHz with the 4 sticks. Yeah, I managed to get my 4 sticks of DDR5 (4x16GB@7800MHz) to run stable at 5600MHz. I’d stick to 2, especially since even if you manage to get four running they’ll at best be running at nearly half the frequency of two sticks. Running 4 sticks sticks with DDR5 (especially on AM5) is an easy way to guarantee to not hit high speeds. 4 sticks pros: Better OC with T-topology mobos (some high end ones). If you want 64GB of DDR5, you should use a 2x32GB kit which comes in a single box. You will have no problem running DDR5 6000 with two sticks, but four sticks might work with a Z790 chipset and 13th gen Intel. 4 sticks of (presumably single ranked) 8gb dimms will actually give you slightly more bandwidth than two, because each memory channel can address two ranks. If I decide I want 64gb of RAM instead of 32gb, am I better off buying a whole new set of 32gb (a pair) instead of trying to run 4x 16gb sticks? Let's say hypothetically, that I have two sticks of 8gb 6000hz ddr5 and two sticks of 16gb 6000hz ddr5. And yes, I already know getting 4 sticks of DDR5 to run at overclocked rated speeds is not guaranteed and will require tweaking. Would there be an issue if I installed all… I have heard that having 4 sticks of ddr5 is way worst compared to 2 sticks, is it really a big difference, or I won't feel it? If your cpus integrated memory controller can run it at advertised speeds then there won't be any difference. This means that the 2 main DIMM slots will have a better signal path and thats why RAM OC mainboards only have those 2 and not the 2 sub-par slots, because nobody would use them for OC reasons anyways. If you run 3 sticks, all 3 will run in single-channel mode, which is a significant bandwidth bottleneck afaik. And yes I need the high I would consider myself a noob when it comes to compatibility and different pc parts (thankfully i followed someones build aka TECHSOURCE on YT) But i'm pairing a 4080 super with a z790 aorus pro x board + intel i7-14700kf and 4 sticks of 16 gb DDR5 ram 6000 (G. Trying to run 4 dimms at say 8000mhz vs 6000mhz is quite different. Will loose you a bit of performance then. That's why it's recommend to run less sticks. Just finished a build with ASUS Hero z790, TUF 4090, and 13900K. So 2 sticks of dual rank or four sticks of single rank. With 4 sticks, you're likely to have some heat problems without proper airflow over the sticks. I don't have DDR5 but dual channel ram sticks are always the better choice. DDR5 is a bit different, because it has what are sometimes called sub-channels. Found it on Asus QVL for ram compatible with that board 4 sticks 6000. Disable fast boot. Four sticks of RAM are harder to run than two sticks on any platform, just how it is. For PC questions/assistance. Is it feasible to install another 64GB of the exact same RAM for a total of 4 sticks equaling 128GB total (max out the RAM capacity just because)? 2 sticks of dual rank is also likely best for DDR5. 25 to 1. I’m planning to install 4 x Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 CL30-38-38-96 1. SKILL F5-5200J3636D32GX2-RS5K, all presumably f Do NOT use 4 sticks of DDR5 if you want high speeds. 4 sticks @ 6400 was pulling much more power off dimm 1&3 and spiking my CPU temps ~+10°c over average under load Reply reply More replies oldrjohnson11 Best of Reddit; Topics; My girlfriend bought me more ram for my pc and I tried installing the new kit to my existing 2 sticks to make 4, however my build would I plan to run one DIMM per channel so two sticks of 32 or 48, I understand that in the DDR4 space running a total of two sticks is better than 4 sticks. Just put this build together, first time working with AM5 and DDR5. Memory: 2x Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB 32GB 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 EXPO (4 sticks total, 64GB) GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4090 Founders Edition 24GB PSU: ASUS ROG Loki 1000W SFX-L I am just reading about the possible lower speeds when pairing 4 sticks of DDR5 ram versus 2. (I've seen a year old video of someone enabling XMP with DDR5 by increasing DRAM Voltage to 1. 4 sticks cons: If sticks are dual rank, you get 4 ranks per channel, which is very taxing on the memory controller. The largest you can get currently is 48GB per stick for DDR5, so there are 2x48GB sets out (for 96GB total). In a general case, I'd normally prefer 2 sticks. 4 not ok. If your sticks don't have RGB or, for any other reason, you want different sticks, buy new and do not use the older The main limiter right now is the CPU memory controllers. 4 sticks of 48gb ddr5 6400mhz OC'd to 5. Archived post. QUESTIONS Can the same be said for DDR5 running 2 vs 4 sticks is two sticks better than 4? (forgetting latency and frequency here is its still better to run two?) Those temps are a bit high, even if just using XMP. That just the 2 benefits the dual channel because of the speeds. The absolute least stress on the memory controller. No idea if XMP - 200MHz is a magic number or 5800MHz is just the highest it can go. Do not try running xmp on ddr5 with more than two sticks it’s a known issue. MOBO: Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X ATX LGA1700 DDR5 version RAM: 4 sticks Corsair Vengeance 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-5600 CL36 Runs fine for months with 2 sticks for a total of 32gb, added 2 more identical sticks for a total of 64gb and no boot DRAM LED on MOBO stays lit. I'm not sure what you are doing, but if you need speed also, then 2x will be your best bet. It 4 sticks is NOT 'quad channel'. DDR5 has been having some serious issues with 4x setups, so if it's DDR5, I would try to avoid using 4 at the moment. This reduces bandwidth and increases latency. 3. 4ghz was booting and testing fine just in case there was a chance of instability. I know a year ago there were alot of discussions on this and said that ddr5 with 4 sticks wont run at advertised speeds. The main reason motherboards have 4 DIMM slots, is because way back when, thats what you had to do in order to get a higher total capacity, but now we have far larger capacity ram As a matter of fact 4 stick ddr5 8000 will not even work on an INTEL platform either. And if it does which one would be better with 4 sticks of ram? Ddr4 or ddr5. 13th gen will have a higher supported speed. I would stay away from trying to save money and buying 4x16 GB sticks, as four sticks is far harder on the memory controller and you'll need to significantly downclock them from 5600 MT/s to get them stable. 32GB will be enough for now depending on how you use your PC while you game. So is the performance increase with 2 sticks over the 4 sticks worth spending the extra $61? This really isn't the full story though. I think I could pull off a bit more, but I am too lazy to experiment. CPU is a i5 13600KF When I enable XMP1 (or XMP2) sometimes during games I get BSOD. And put the dual channel ram sticks in both A slots. If you're look at XMP on your RAM, you've You can't yet. So it’s going to be a lot tougher to reach XMP speeds with 4 sticks. The slots are from left to right A B A B. Basically splits each channel into 2 chips. You can see this clearly in MSI motherboard specifications, they list the max tested frequencies for each config. 4 sticks single rank 4d1r might be 5000 and 4d2r might be 4800. Something like 6000mhz is going to be fine with 4 dimms (assuming things like proper motherboard and what not) and is definitely happening as ddr5 matures Also, T-topology motherboards handle 4 sticks better, though I’m not sure if any LGA1700 motherboards use T-topology. Not a big deal on a mature platform like DDR4, but a huge deal on DDR5 where it still has stability issues; especially stability issues with running 4 sticks of RAM. I made the mistake of buying 4x16GB Corsair Dominator DDR5 thinking that things were relatively the same as they were 8 years ago when I built my previous system. Ryzen 7000 shouldn't be that bad either. I was using Dual Channel before (Slots A2 and B2) and this worked perfectly. Furthermore, I know I can buy two stick kits that can do 6000 / 6400 that are on the Extreme QVL. Asus Rog Hero Z790. More then likely end of the current CPU cycle if not 14th gen/ryzen 9000 cycle. Best of Reddit; Topics; Content Policy; (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6400 if you have slots 1-4 but only two sticks they may need to be installed in slots 2 2x2R - DDR5-5200 4x1R - DDR5-3600 4x2R - DDR5-3600 I'm looking to purchase my first AMD CPU and will probably use it for games as well as workload (VMs / transcoding), so I'd like to get more than 64GB of RAM, but confused on options. Even AMD only guarantees 3600, because 4 DDR5 DIMMs is incredibly hard on the memory controller. So nutshell, you can do 4 channel, you'll just have to slow it up a little bit. And when you do things beside while gaming like streaming or having many browser windows or have 2 games open (I have 2-3 open on times) 32GB will be filled easily that is why I look to get 64GB. Best of Reddit; Topics; Content Policy; Boot times between 2 and 4 sticks are from around 10 seconds to 60 seconds respectively. And with DDR5, once you're at 5200MHz, it can be VERY difficult (if not impossible) to go higher with four sticks of RAM. So I did some research and found that for this architecture, the DDR5 must be slowed down to 3600MHz to run 4 sticks. 64gb in oc is not easy to handle) still early adopter with this platform (new socket/chipset and amd/intel are new to ddr5) That's not exclusively a DDR5 problem, more sticks and memory ICs will mean more instability over fewer. Almost everything is daisy chain topology these days (better for 2 sticks but worse for 4) If yours support DDR4 it will not support DDR5 and vice-versa. Any problem with using 4 sticks of DDR4-4000 ram on an i7 13700k? I'm looking at the G. Tbh I like the aesthic of 4 sticks but don’t wanna cap my performance, I do understand that is a drastic ram frequency difference. If it turn on XMP in the BIOS to get the sticks operating at 5600, it does not POST. Which will result in a failed boot after wich the BIOS will turn XMP off for you. And will not run at EXPO speeds. Obviously, I realized they weren't listed on the ASUS z790-e QVL and ended up with GSkill 2x32GB even though I would have preferred the 4 DIMM Dominator for the looks. 2 sticks of dual is a bit better because you can use them on 2 dimm boards and a lot of 4 dimm boards use the daisy chain topology for the ram. The problem: I'd like to be running 64 gb of ram on the build, while i know its not super important i've been toying with the build for so long now its a matter of principle that it does not seem to be working. This splits every memory channel into 2 sticks and splits every stick into 2 memory chips. I had the same issue on a asus z690 motherboard : with 4x DDR5 RAM/Memory installed the system does not completes post & wouldnt boot - with 2x DDR5 Memory everythign works normally in every Slot. If you are going to try, I would recommend using the newest non-beta BIOS available and saving your current BIOS settings into a profile. I got this using a ASUS Pro Art z790, i9 13900k, I also have the ram in a custom loop. Officially, XMP isn't supported with 4 DIMMs on any AM5 board. Intel basically just means that 5600mhz with 2 sticks is guaranteed and if you can’t achieve it, then it’s something you can go through a warranty process for. (ran DeepFaceLive for 2 hours). I plan to upgrade to 64 by getting another of the kit I already have, as it is cheaper. I've sort of made a rule (And this applied to me running DDR4 at XMP speeds with 4 sticks in the past as well), that whatever speed they advertise, the best you're going to get is -400 MHz with 4 sticks. Even then, you will likely experience better performance from 2 dual rank sticks in slots A2 and B2 (2nd and 4th slots from CPU) versus 4 singe rank sticks and still have the same total capacity. But take note of the 'up to', they're stating for a single stick of single rank memory. If you are currently satisfied with your memory sticks, and if the price of buying two more identical sticks is less than purchasing new sticks, I would run 4 sticks. That's not exactly true. I'm currently running 2 sticks of Kingston Beast RGB DDR5 32GB 5200MT/s (64GB total), XMP enabled, and I do not overclock. If it can't then you will need to lower the speed. The reason it is inferior is the extra contacts and traces involved in 2 sticks per channel vs just 1. But, ddr4 has 4 internal ranks, that is, each stick already behaves like 4 things that the memory controller can issue instructions to, ddr5 has 8 and this is already in diminishing returns territory. it comes stock with: 16GB DDR5-4800 SO-DIMM x 2 (Max Capacity: 64GB) Supports dual channel memory — TIA Most boards will run Hynix a or m die at 4800 with 4 DIMMs, but XMP is out of the question on any AM5 board with 4 DIMMs regardless of IC. Also, I keep seeing people saying not to use all 4 DIMM slots. Luckily for me, 2 sticks is still 64gb so that’s ok for now. As far as I know, only Hynix M-die kits can reliable run DDR5-6000 at a respectable CL w/ tight timings (CL36 or lower) w/ 4 dimms. This way I still get the lower latency of the XMP settings, but not the full speed. Skill Trident Z5 RGB Series (Intel XMP) 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin SDRAM DDR5 6400 Cinebench score was the same with two sticks vs four sticks. The same 4 sticks of DDR5 that the ASUS board couldn't run without a lot of manual tweaking runs right out of the box on its XMP profile with the ASRock board. Since DDR5 is so new memory rank structure is predictable as follows: 8gb DIMM = 1Rx16 single rank 16gb DIMM = 1Rx8 single rank 24gb DIMM = 1Rx8 single rank 32gb DIMM = 2Rx8 dual rank 48gb DIMM = 2Rx8 dual rank Because if you are going to spend this amount of money just for gaming (and no incremental upgrade) then a 5800X3D based system will give you the current best DCS performance bar none. Skill RipJaws V Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-4000 that's on sale and I want to get 2 sets of them for 64GB total. The CPU is rated for DDR5-5200 with 2 DIMMs filled vs DDR5-3600 with 4 DIMMs to give an idea of the capability difference. Anything above is an overclock and is what you are really asking about when you hear four sticks are finnicky because everyone wants to run them fast. 4 sticks being unstable even at 4200 is pretty unusual. 4-1. Once you start tightening timings, it's less tolerant of heat and can start throwing errors above 50c or so. 5066 passes all 4 passes with zero Sticks: G. this is growing pains. Your best bet if you truly need 64 gigs is to buy a 32x2 kit but that would be pretty much stuck at 6000-6600 1:1 since its dual rank, you would basically be lucky to run 7200 in 2:1 It means only 2 of the 4 are short connected and 2 slots are connected with a worse signal path. (I have this problem atm and it fucking sucks) So I'm just wondering if 4 16gb sticks of ddr5 ram can run 6000mhz and be stable on the nzxt b650e motherboard. You generally want to keep DDR5 below 65c or so with stock XMP. It also as expected runs stable with only 2 dimms and XMP enabled at 6000MHz. Afterwards book 2x DDR5 Memory with the desired max. 12th-gen's memory controller is the weakest Intel DDR5 controller, so it's a crapshoot whether it'll work at XMP speeds, but DDR5 But what tends to matter the most is what your motherboard says it’s rated for, if it says 6400mhz, and your running 2x ram sticks, it should definitely work. Same issue. When I dropped the new Kit of Ram in, the rig didn't boot and was stuck on the DRAM Led. Hey all- Ok for background- my son and I built a really solid computer, however after the build we have heard about only using 2 RAM sticks, instead of 4 when Using DDR5 because the MSI MB's and most all motherboards aren't setup yet for 4 ram sticks utilization w DDR5. An overclock profile on 4 sticks of single or dual rank is a HUGE silicon lottery gamble for AMD because Ryzen 7000 is their first generation into DDR5, meanwhile Intel can do it no problem because they've had 3 generations to improve their IMC. In your case the sticks are likely dual rank (at least Best of Reddit; Topics; sticking in another 32GB due to the issues I've heard about running 4 sticks at 6000 MHz. It's to do with attempting to run 4 memory ranks per channel. It was pretty easy with 1600-1866 DDR3 it got harder with 3600MHz DDR4. Now this issue isn't with '4 sticks', though that doesnt help. The two kits are mixed as well. With 4 dual rank sticks you are pretty much trying to make the IMC run with 8 single rank sticks. It'd be the same with 2x16gb dual ranked dimms. This kit looks to be the best option with the tightest… The QVL shows vendors and serial numbers, speed, xmp support of sticks that will support 4, however the type mentioned above does not. Best of Reddit; Topics; 4 sticks of ddr5 If DDR5 was like having 2 DIMMs per DIMM compared to DDR4 you wouldn’t have DDR4 Xeon systems that have faster memory performance than consumer DDR5 systems. If you are going to consider a 13th Gen upgrade at some point then Intel is certainly the best and DDR5 will perform better than DDR4 for most games now. Now that I add 64GB more (4 sticks), I haven't been able to get the XMP profile to work. Feb 6, 2024 · So since your board accepts your ram with 2x sticks as a given stable config, best bet if you want 32Gb is simply use 2x16Gb. Obviously I want performance, but the thing is that I also have special workloads that require/prefer large amounts of RAM (the more the better, really!), so in an ideal world I would like to run 128 GB DDR5. I've learned since failing to boot with XMP that 4 sticks of DDR5 on this platform just doesn't really work. Im gonna upgrade the cpu, mobo, and ram sometime soon and 4 sticks looks better to me. If you want to absolutely push the limits on speed, you're going to want 2 dimms. It’s faster than my (4) sticks of DDR5 in my i9 because the i9 clearly only supports dual channel. (3600 vs 6000) However the good news is X3D CPUs are almost completely unphased by slow ram, at least for gaming where fast ram is usually important. I am looking at building a new pc and might want to go for 2 x 16 sticks of ram, and then later on adding 2 more sticks. This is on a Z690 motherboard. professional overclocker running 4 sticks of ddr5 at high speeds is very My 7800x3d runs 4 ram sticks of 6400 ddr5 without issue. I already have two sticks of (2x16)32gb ram @ 6000mhz. 6000 isn't happening. PC has PLENTY of powerful fans (about 14 industrial noctuas at like $20 per fan lol) and tuned for optimized airflow. RAM sticks have to run in matched pairs in order for the machine to run them in dual-channel mode. My pc wont post if I put in all 4 sticks. Zen 4 and 12th gen Intel can run 4 kits of 32GB DDR5 ram stable at only ~4000-4400Mhz. Officially 2 sticks of anything is 4400mhz supported (in a 4 DIMM board), while 4 single rank is 4000 and 4 dual rank is 3600. (4x) DOMINATOR PLATINUM RGB 5600 mhz DDR5 (16gb sticks) MasterLiquid ML360L V2 ARGB PSU 750w Gigabyte (I will soon take an 850w or more if needed) So for the DDR5 sticks, they can't POST if the frequency is above 4500mhz, and the system is stable only at values below 4266mhz, the clocks are 36/36/36/76/112, and I'm using the basic XMP profile. You’ll also probably have to manually up the ddr5 vdd and vddq voltages to somewhere around 1. AMD has only validated 4 DDR5 sticks to work at 3600. For every car added to the equation, the chance of there being any problem occurring with at least one of them increases exponentially. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 4 sticks of ram is significantly harder for the CPU's IMC (Integrated Memory Controller) to drive, 2 sticks of ram will always be king when it comes to performance. Oct 4, 2024 · I’ve got a pre-built system that came with a B650M C V2 motherboard, and having an impossible time getting 4 sticks of RAM to work with it. Ive read that it didnt work well but that was about a year ago. Hello, I have 4x16GB DDR5 Corsair Vengeance RGB 6000 MHz. Worst: 4 sticks of dual rank RAM. 128GB DDR5 (4 DIMMS) on ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO - Can't POST on default settings anymore? Troubleshooting I had 4 DIMMS of DDR5 dominators with a z790 rog maximus. When I only had 2 sticks (64GB), I had XMP 1 profile activated at 5600MHz working without problems. 2 sticks single rank 2d1r might also be 5400. Many people have posted saying they can run 2 sticks, but not 4. Looking at a new build and decided on a 14900k /w a z790 Dark Hero. When asking a question or stating a problem, please add as much detail as possible. Actually, 4 sticks can have a slightly better performance than 2 sticks. Also go for 32GB, my 16GB sticks always ran on 15GB. The best I was able to do was enable XMP and then manually reduce the clock speed of the DRAM from 5600 down to 4800. I couldn't post at XMP (rated for 6000mhz) but underclocking to 5066mhz is 100% stable. but still similar. And various ram settings in bios. My question is, is DDR5 still unstable with 4 sticks? Or has this greatly improved? 32gb still enough for gaming these days? Yea with 4 sticks they're less reliable at speeds higher then the board officially supports (Ryzen 5000 = DDR4 3200, Ryzen 7000 = DDR5 5200). I used 2 identical kits (4 32G sticks for a total of 128G) of G. I need 128GB RAM for my devmachine/workstation. looking for (2) higher-end 32GB RAM stick recommendations for this ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 15 (2022) G533ZX-XS96 machine. The system boots up fine with XMP I enabled on default settings in BIOS (my mobo is ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-F). I also checked cpu pins. Considering people are having trouble with just using 2x16 at 6000, 4 sticks at 6400 is a ton of strain on the memory controller. It’s a bit of a gamble and there’s no guarantee. 4 sticks (more sticks, harder to run than fewer) high capacity (more total capacity also makes it harder on the imc. Yeahhhh I went back to 2 sticks @ 7200mhz…. Going from 32GB to 64GB on two sticks will increase the number of chips on each stick. I currently have 32gb of teamgroup tforce ddr5 6000mhz cl30 ram and want to buy another set of it for 64gb. I was looking at GSkillz Z5 6000mhz with 36-36-36-76 or 36-36-36-96. with two sticks it is ok to run at 5200 (with expo) , but no way to boot with 4 sticks. There are no 4 stick DDR5 kits yet so any combination of sticks. Possible clearance issues with huge coolers. So say with 2 sticks it works at 6000, with 4 sticks you have to reduce the speed to 5800 I wanted to upgrade from 32GB of DDR5 Ram to 64GB. My question is what exactly is creating the problem with 4 sticks and if there is a way around it. Did not hear anything about basic stability testing after enabled XMP with a new DDR5 generation on a problematic ASUS z690 mainboard. But! I did hear some things about 4 sticks bring unstable at DDR5 speeds, so I might want to just get 2 x 32 sticks. So 2x48GB ends up being able to run a bit faster than 4x24GB. That avoids guessing, as the sticks are already factory tested for Sep 18, 2024 · Just finished my new build and started testing the components, I went with 4 sticks of 16gb, Corsair dominator 6000mhz, even if all feedback I got Dec 2, 2023 · 4 sticks is a bad idea for performance unless you REALLY need the extra ram capacity. When I tried to go from 2 to 4 sticks, the PC did boot up, but internet would always only work for 1-2 minutes at best, and then stop working. just got Adata AX5U6000C4016G-BLARBK ram to work stable 64gb 4 sticks 6000 , you can try on any board or ram, no guarantee it'll work. Look at the RAM specs and you'll see that nearly every single DDR5 kit out there is only rated to work at XMP/EXPO when using 1 or 2 sticks. Bad: 4 sticks of single rank RAM. They should all work or something is defective. 4 sticks is still dual channel, you're fine. The two kits were just from amazon for 100$ a piece: G. I have heard that there can be instabilities when running four sticks as they are actually still running in dual channel mode on AMD CPUs. Will 4x16 gb at this speed have any impact on gaming in comparison to 2x16 gb at a higher mhz? Obviously faster RAM will be faster / more performant. For example I run a 13900ks with 4 32 gb sticks at 4000mhz because that is the spec for dual rank dimms at two per channel on that cpu. Haven't done extensive testing yet but this is significantly better than anything I could pull off at 6000MHz where OCCT was seeing errors 30 seconds in. If you have a specific Keyboard/Mouse/AnyPart that is doing something strange, include the model number i. Those are available at up to 6000mt/s. I bought another pack of 2x16GB (Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600MHz CL36 CMK32GX5M2B5600C36), so I have 4 sticks in total. I could post up to 5200mhz, but 5200mhz showed errors in memtest386. Getting a decent speed/CL combo w/ 4 dimms is highly dependent on the kind of RAM modules themselves. I know this kit is not on either the Asus or Corsair QVL. For now stick to 2 sticks. AM5 does not do well with 4 DDR5 modules above base 4800mhz speed. 4x sticks is more load than 2x dual rank sticks. I understand XMP with 4 sticks of DDR5 RAM is fairly complicated currently, but I've tested and my system is very stable with the RAM sticks at 4800MHz. If I look on newegg, I can see that the cheapest kit of 2x32gb is $335 the cheapest kit of 2x16gb is $137 So it would be $61 cheaper to just buy two 2x16gb kits than to buy one 2x32gb kit. Single stick dual rank, 1d2r might be 5400. Terrible. In some cases you may not even reach 5000, especially if the kits arent exactly matched. The board even had no trouble overclocking the RAM from 5600 to 6000 MHz with me only barely having to run up the voltage; 1. 3 for stability, but I can't see how to do this) DDR5 Voltage Control- Program Mode-Enabled: VDDQ Mode-Split, VDD2 Mode-Split, VPP Mode-Split (This Split allowed me to run all 4 sticks, prior to this setting, I could only post with 2 sticks) Don’t believe they exist yet. Best case scenario. Even though the number of ranks is the same, motherboard traces are better optimised for two sticks (on current DDR5 boards). Using 4 sticks will also not result in double the bandwidth, because it is still Dual-Channel. I'm wondering if the processer and motherboard will support the ram with no issues at 6000mhz. I do recall reading that DDR5 has a rough time keeping up with all 4 slots populated, but I was hoping for some knowledge here for how to tune things and still hit those frequencies. If you can get by with 48GB of RAM, you can get a 2x24GB kit of DDR5-7200 CL36 or DDR5-8000 CL40. Basically you're overclocking the memory controller and 4 sticks is always harder to drive than 2. So regardless on whether you have single rank or dual rank, with 4 sticks you're going to struggle to hit above 4800-5200Mhz. Ive been doing a little looking this morning, I want to buy a 2 stick 64gb total kit. Four sticks will become unstable at lower clocks than two sticks; it's a crapshoot that is mostly reliant on your CPU's memory controller. The problem is 4 sticks, especially at higher speeds, are much hard for the cpu memory controller to run than just 2 sticks. If multiple sticks show errors, test another slot. However, doing that and running the 4 sticks, the PC still wont post. Boot into Bios make sure no XMP is on if it is turn it off. Hey, I am trying to run all four slots of DDR5 for the AMD 7950x but Had a question about the configuration. My hypothesis is signal reflectivity issues and slight timing differences thanks to trace length between slots, but I'm not an electrical engineer so that's just my best guess. Any 2x32gb ok. I'm running 32gb x 4 (128gb total) and pass memtest386 with flying colors. So I have a 13700k on a Msi z690 carbon motherboard and I was wondering if I could upgrade from 2 to 4 sticks of ddr5 6000mhz without running Into any issues Archived post. You can do so in 1 to 4 cars. But using just 2 dual rank sticks will achieve the same and will also have more overclocking headroom because more sticks are harder to run. 2 sticks of 16 gb works perfectly but adding 2 more sticks of the exact same ram causes games to crash almost right away, however the 2 ranks per channel is optimal. I am running four sticks of DDR5-5600 CL28 in my Ryzen 5 7600 box in EXPO with no tweaks and an undervolted SOC though, so it's not like it's just plain broken. No luck. 4 sticks at high speed is known to be unreliable, but 4800-5200 should work fine. I would advise you to send back the newly buyed DDR5 Memory + receive the money back for them. This is a lot harder for the IMC to keep up so trying to slap on the EXPO profile that would work if you had one stick in the board just doesn't work. You'll have a hard time running 2x32 GB sticks above 6800/7000, especially when paired with a 4 DIMM slot motherboard. When you run 4 sticks of DDR5 with the best of everything, 13900k and a Z790, you can’t really exceed 6400mhz with a total of 64GB. 35V in a Strix B650-A board with a 7700X. disabled EXPO , changed AI tweaker to try 4800, and it worked ok with 4 stick, but very unstable (2 crash in 1 hours), so lowered to 4200, and now it is stable. 7950X3D + 4 x 16GB DDR5-6000 As a very very broad rule of thumb, if you have, say, a pair of 16GB ddr5 sticks single rank and you add a second pair, making your system a dual rank setup, on the one hand, you may have to reduce the speed you're running your RAM. SKILL Trident Z5 Neo RGB Series) they recommended just 32 gb of ram with the build but i figured it's to be cost effective? If you combine two kits nothing is promised to work. I ask because I want to get 64gb of DDR5 6000+ ram. It's the 2 sticks per channel that is causing all the problems. Good: 2 sticks of dual-rank RAM (necessary for large sizes like 32Gb per stick). (For those of you wondering why I need 64gb of RAM: I don't. So, I want to have 64GB of ram, as I'll be also using it professionally, and the kits I've seen are the following (all DDR5, and cost roughly the same): - 4 sticks 5600 Mhz CL36 XMP - 2 sticks 5200 Mhz CL40 XMP - 2 sticks 5600 Mhz CL40 but with AMD EXPO From the specs on the motherboard it lists the following: 4x DDR5, Maximum Memory Capacity 128GB Corsair DDR5 Vengeance RGB 4x16GB 6000MHz RTX 4070 Ti Super All 4 sticks run stable at default bios settings which only runs at a speed of 4266MHz. I don't plan to ever go 128gb for this build. Aesthetics. Shutdown the pc install all 4 sticks if no boot RMA MB and RAM. 2 sticks Don't touch 4 with ddr5 Absolute nightmare I recommend a 2x48-6800 kit T-creates are the cheapest and have the best cooling, not that they're particularly cheap though tl;dr - Yes, I have 128G DDR5 with 13900K running stable --- but with inordinately long (VERY very long) POST times. If anyone knows if it can i would appreciate it. Try to get 2x32 GB sticks instead of 4. My Xeon 8270 workstation has (6) sticks of ECC 2933Mhz and it supports 6 channels. At first everyone was saying it’s because all 4 sticks need to be from the same kit even if they are exactly the same. Every single time I boot it up. Best options are 2x48GB modules if you need speed, or just accept lower speed at 4x32 or 4x48GB (4800-5600mhz, depending on individual silicon lottery). Best of Reddit; Topics; no way in hell you will get 7800 running on 4 sticks. 45 volts to be stable if you want to run at that speed. Single stick of ram, 1d1r 5600. XMP disabled. If you're willing to spend a few hours messing with the memory timings to get everything working then you'll get 128GB of DDR5. e. not that long ago, getting 4 sticks of DDR4 3800 to run stable was impossible, and now you can do it with a button press. If you want speed, you gotta take 2 sticks. Putting 4 stick into a consumer board (AM5 / Intel Socket 1700), results in Dual Channel with 2 sticks per channel. Yeah I don't even know why they put 4 ram slots in motherboards, it's not HEDT so it's only dual channel anyway. I wanted to fill all 4 slots of RAM for aesthetic reasons, and was given a tip from another reddit user to setup 2 sticks first at the listed EXPO/XMP 1 profile and confirm that it works, then without changing anything install 2 more sticks. SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series 96GB (2 x 48GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 5600 (PC5 44800) Desktop Memory Model F5-5600J4040D48GX2-RS5K comment sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. It's worth a few percentage points of performance in some games. If that. If it's DDR4, you should be okay to have 4 sticks. My Memtest errors were on test 3 and 4. You'll also need a decent quality memory controller on your CPU. At 6000, they are unstable, and lots of DDR5 kits or sticks are unstable right now with 4 sticks and high speeds. Had it running for 2 weeks with only 2 sticks without issue. For the Z790 Aorus Master, the online manual suggests you run either 2 or 4 sticks. You might be able to get 4 sticks at XMP settings with a different RAM or motherboard, or maybe even a future BIOS update. Does anyone have any recommendations on DDR5 RAM speeds for the Gigabyte Z790 AORUS Elite X wifi7 MB? I keep seeing conflicting things about it. His experience wont be that different with DDR4 either and it doesnt matter if its Intel or AMD, untested OC is never a great idea. Frankly the linked post is just making bad assumptions and any such things are going to be due to availability rather than what is acutely the best configuration. Reply reply DrippyWaffler I was also unable to get 4 sticks of DDR5 stable at the rated XMP speeds. That said, the X3D cache reduces the impact of memory performance so losing frequency may not impact your workloads. So unless you need to max out the RAM capacity of your board for work purposes or something, it's best to stick to 2 sticks and get whatever is the best price vs performance ram instead (Ryzen 5000 = DDR4 3600 , Ryzen 7000 = DDR5 6000). You'll have to wait for it to mature a bit. I'm going to be buying a ASUS ROG Strix Z790-A Gaming WiFi Motherboard with an I9 13900k and 4 8gb sticks of corsair vengeance ddr5 ram. From what I've gathered 4 sticks of DDR5 on a consumer-grade motherboard is however not really stable at higher XMP frequencies, so I'm Because it's the CPUs that are different, with Ryzen 7000 unable to hit speeds above DDR5-6400 at all but being better than 12th gen in some cases with 4 sticks. ngzk ofvsjg ysylh looyev nkyohx hgppv hvzdkpys gvbu tzvm aglvoj